GUTOD

 Today: Generally. In 1926, H.W. Fowler used the term “superstitions” to describe, in the field of writing, “unintelligent applications of an unintelligent dogma” (Modern English Usage 586 [1st ed.]). Experts in usage have long railed against them as arrant nonsense, yet they retain a firm grip — if not a stranglehold — on the average …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Superstitions (1) Read More »

 supplement, n.; complement, n. A “supplement” is simply something added {a dietary supplement}. A “complement” is a wholly adequate supplement; it’s something added to complete or perfect a whole {that scarf is a perfect complement to your outfit}. supplementary; supplemental; suppletory; *suppletive. “Supplementary” is the ordinary word. The other forms have the same meaning, namely, …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries Read More »

Today: Misused for “surpass” or “beat.” Sportswriters have begun using “supersede” as a synonym of “beat”: thus, one team is said to “supersede” another when it wins a game. E.g.: Tim Cowlishaw, “Cowboys Superseded [read ‘Beaten’] by Redskins: Dallas Defense Overpowered in 35-16 Loss,” Dallas Morning News, 7 Sept. 1993, at B1. And other writers …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: supersede (3). Read More »

Today: The Corresponding Noun. “Supersession” is the noun form of “supersede,” meaning either “the act of superseding” or “the state of being superseded.” E.g.: “School Board 12 is the sixth community school board that has had part of its operations superseded by Mr. Fernandez and his aides. Supersession is a more lenient step than suspension.” …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: supersede (2) Read More »

Today: Spelling. This word — from the Latin root “-sed-” (“to sit”), not “-ced-” (“to move”) — is properly spelled with an internal -s-, not a -c-. But so many other English words end in “-cede” or “-ceed” that many writers unconsciously distort the spelling of “supersede.” Spelling it correctly is one of the hallmarks …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: supersede Read More »

supervise is occasionally misspelled *"supervize" — e.g.: “And when any out-of-state parolee is under New Hampshire’s jurisdiction, it is the Granite State’s parole board [that] supervizes [read ‘supervises’] parole.” Pat Grossmith, “Humphrey’s Criminal Record Wasn’t Shared Between Region’s States,” Union Leader (Manchester, N.H.), 19 Oct. 1994, at 4. supervisory; supervisorial. “Supervisory” = of or relating …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries Read More »

These words have almost opposite senses. “Sumptuous” = excessively luxurious; made or produced at great cost {a sumptuous feast}. “Sumptuary” = relating to or designed to regulate expenditures {sumptuary regulations}. “Sumptuous” is sometimes misspelled *”sumptious,” perhaps under the influence of “scrumptious” — e.g.: o “If you have a leftover fish, you can convert it into …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: sumptuous; sumptuary Read More »

sum total of. This phrase is technically a redundancy — “sum” meaning “total” — but it’s a venial one not likely to disappear from the modern lexicon. And the phrase can be especially useful for emphatic purposes in such lines as “the sum total of our knowledge” — although a few sticklers would probably prefer …

Garner’s Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries Read More »

The broad term for a person who believes that a disenfranchised class of people should have the right to vote is “suffragist.” That term has been traced back to the early 19th century. In American English, it extends especially to women’s suffrage. “Suffragette” (referring specifically to any woman who participated in the movement to give …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: suffragist; suffragette. Read More »

This phrase is verbose for “enough” — e.g.: o “As might be expected, he found a sufficient number of [read ‘enough’] legislators receptive to the state’s crying need to legalize betting.” O.K. Carter, “Races’ Old Patron Would Be Proud,” Ft. Worth Star-Telegram, 17 Apr. 1997, at 1. o “But the 1996 farm law requires the …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: sufficient number of, a. Read More »

“Suffice it to say” is the subjunctive form of “it suffices to say.” E.g.: o “Suffice it to say that the plotters, once their plan has been set into motion, aren’t content to leave well enough alone.” Janet Maslin, “‘Deathtrap’ with Michael Caine,” N.Y. Times, 19 Mar. 1982, at C8. o “When her students were …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: suffice it to say. Read More »

Part A: As a Demonstrative Adjective. “Such” is properly used as an adjective when reference has previously been made to a category of people or things: thus “such” means “of that kind” {such a person} {such people}. It isn’t properly equivalent to “this,” “that,” “these,” or “those.” With this word two points should be kept …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: such. Read More »

Part A: Pronunciation. “Substantive” — a commonly mispronounced word — has three, not four, syllables: /SUHB-stuhn-tiv/. The common error in American English is to insert what is technically known as an epenthetical “-e-” after the second syllable: /SUHB-stuh-nuh-tiv/. Still another blunder is to accent the second syllable: /suhb-STAN-tiv/. Language-Change Index — “substantive” mispronounced with four …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: substantive. Read More »

subsistence is occasionally misspelled *”subsistance” — e.g.: “Fuller rightly observes that the causes of Third World deforestation are complex, varied and largely attributable to the subsistance [read ‘subsistence’] needs of local people.” Ted Ferrioli, “Maybe if We Called Loggers ‘Rural Natives’ It Would Help,” Oregonian (Portland), 28 June 1996, at C7. substantiate. So spelled — …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries. Read More »

Part A: For “later.” Using the four-syllable word in place of the two-syllable word is rarely, if ever, a good stylistic choice. Part B: And “consequently.” Though both words contain the sense “following” or “occurring later,” “consequently” has primarily a causal nuance: “occurring because of.” Frequently “subsequently” (which has no connotation of causation) is misused …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: subsequently. Read More »

These verbs overlap, but only in their secondary senses; they’re best kept separate. The primary sense of “sublimate,” the more common word, is “to transmute (an instinct) from one form to another, esp. to a more socially acceptable form” — e.g.: “The current popular outrage about corporate governance is mostly sublimated concern about declining stock …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: sublimate; sublime, vb. Read More »

In modern English, the subjunctive mood of the verb appears primarily in six contexts: (1) conditions contrary to fact {if I were king} (where the indicative would be “am”); (2) suppositions {if I were to go, I wouldn’t be able to finish this project} (where the indicative would be “was”); (3) wishes {I wish that …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Subjunctives. Read More »

The core words in a sentence are the subject and the verb. They are related both in sense and in grammar. And related words should go together. If you separate them too much, the sentence goes asunder — e.g.: o “Jurors’ need to hear that testimony again just minutes before reaching a verdict puzzled experts.” …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Subject-Verb Separation. Read More »

Miscellaneous Entries *submittal (= [1] the act of submitting; or [2] something submitted) is a needless variant of “submission” — e.g.: “Town code requires members to act on applications within 180 days of submittal [read ‘submission’ or ‘their being submitted’].” Jonathan McNeilly, “New Rite Aid Plans Rejected in Henniker,” Union Leader (Manchester, N.H.), 1 May …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries. Read More »

Part A: “one in five”; “one of every five.” When the first number is “one,” this construction takes a singular: “one in three is not admitted,” “one of every five achieves a perfect score,” etc. Part B: Decades. Decades customarily take plural verbs: “the 1930s were a tough time in America.” The following is unidiomatic: …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Subject-Verb Agreement (9). Read More »