GUTOD

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: swing/swung/swung.

So inflected. The dialectal *"swang" is fairly common — e.g.: o “One of [the boys] swang [read ‘swung’] erratically, topping his ball, which rattled a few yards along the grass and disappeared into a drainage ditch.” Don Gillmor, “Scot on the Rocks,” Sun-Sentinel (Ft. Lauderdale), 27 Feb. 1994, at J1. o “As the youngster performed …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: swing/swung/swung. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries.

symposium. The plural is :symposiums.” *"Symposia" is a pedantry. synagogue, n., is the standard spelling. *"Synagog" is a variant. synchronous; *synchronic; *synchronal. The second and third are needless variants. synonym for “pseudonym” (= a pen name) is a bizarre error — e.g.: “All of the contributors used synonyms [read ‘pseudonyms’]: Etienne George signed himself as …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Swapping Horses.

“Swapping horses while crossing the stream” is H.W. Fowler’s term for vacillating between two constructions (Modern English Usage 589 [1st ed.]). Thus, someone writes that “the rate of divorce is almost as high in Continental Europe, other things being equal, than it is in the United States.” The first “as” needs a second one in …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Swapping Horses. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: sustained injuries.

“Sustained injuries” is officialese for “was injured” — e.g.: “Also since the series, parents have filed lawsuits alleging two area children sustained injuries [read ‘were injured’] at unsafe play areas.” Rosa Salter, “L.V. Dad Envisions Playground Safety Network,” Morning Call (Allentown, Pa.), 25 Nov. 1996, A.M. Mag. §, at D1. Why prefer an edit that …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: sustained injuries. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Language-Change Index.

The third edition of Garner’s Modern American Usage reflects several new practices. Invariably inferior forms, for example, are now marked with asterisks preceding the term or phrase, a marking common in linguistics. The most interesting new feature is the Language-Change Index. Its purpose is to measure how widely accepted various linguistic innovations have become. Such …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Language-Change Index. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries.

swat (= to swing at [something] with a slapping movement) is the standard spelling. *”Swot” is a variant. sweetbrier, denoting a type of European rose, is so spelled — not *”sweetbriar.” swivel, vb., makes “swiveled” and “swiveling” in American English, “swivelled” and “swivelling” in British English. *sworn affidavit is a common redundancy. syllabus. The plural …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: surname; Christian name; forename; given name.

The surname (or “family name”) denotes (wholly or partly) one’s kinship. In many cases it was derived from physical characteristics, occupations, or locations and later transmitted to descendants (e.g., Smith); in other cases it indicated paternity (e.g., Davidson). Such names came to be called “surnames.” The modern custom is that a woman who marries may, …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: surname; Christian name; forename; given name. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: surmise.

Part A. Spelling: As noun and verb, the word is so spelled — not *”surmize.” E.g.: “Other officials even extended their optimism to surmize [read ‘surmise’] that ‘a new climate has begun.’” Ana Martinez-Soler, “Madrid Cheers as France Quashes ETA Terrorists,” Christian Science Monitor, 17 Jan. 1984, at 7. Part B: And *”surmisal.” The word …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: surmise. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: supposed to.

“Supposed to” (= expected to) wrongly made *”suppose to” is an exceedingly common error — e.g.: o “We’re suppose [read ‘supposed’] to feel her greatest humiliation in this scene.” Avis L. Weathersbee, “Judging TV’s Black Images,” Chicago Sun-Times, 8 Apr. 2001, Showcase §, at 1. o “‘The Price of Milk’ is suppose [read ‘supposed’] to …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: supposed to. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: supposable, suppositious, supposititious, suppositional, *suppositive

“Supposable” = capable of being supposed; presumable. E.g.: “He learns more about himself and the supposable dimension of man’s future.” Dick Richmond, “A Sequel to ‘The Celestine Prophecy,’” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 16 May 1996, at G7. “Suppositious” and “supposititious” sometimes cause confusion. Although some modern dictionaries list these as variants, some differentiation is both possible …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: supposable, suppositious, supposititious, suppositional, *suppositive Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: supplicant, *suppliant

supplicant; *suppliant. “Supplicant” is the standard term meaning “one who earnestly beseeches; a humble petitioner” — e.g.: o “Upstairs in a darkened room of the Edina home in which he was staying, Sakya Trizin, supreme head of one of Tibetan Buddhism’s four branches, received a constant stream of supplicants.” Kay Miller, “Buddhism from Tibet Pursues …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: supplicant, *suppliant Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries

susceptible — properly sounded /suh-SEP-tuh-buhl/ — is sometimes mispronounced, even by educated speakers, /suhk-SEP-tuh-buhl/. suspendable; *suspendible. The latter is a needless variant. Though *"suspendible" is the only form listed in Webster’s Third New International Dictionary and the Oxford English Dictionary, “suspendable” is eight times as common. swab (= [1] a mop; or [2] a cotton …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Superstitions (8)

Today: Four More. “Never Use ‘between’ with More than Two Objects”: “When Miss Thistlebottom taught you in grammar school that ‘between’ applies only to two things and ‘among’ to more than two, she was for the most part correct. ‘Between’ essentially does apply to only two, but sometimes the ‘two’ relationship is present when more …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Superstitions (8) Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Superstitions (7)

Today: “Never Use ‘since’ to Mean ‘because.’” o “There is a groundless notion current both in the lower schools and in the world of affairs that ‘since’ has an exclusive reference to time and therefore cannot be used as a causal conjunction. . . . No warrant exists for avoiding this usage, which goes back, …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Superstitions (7) Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Superstitions (6)

 Today: “Never Begin a Sentence with ‘Because.’” So novel and absurd is this superstition that few authorities on writing have countered it in print. But here’s one: “This proscription [‘Never begin a sentence with because’] appears in no handbook of usage I know of, but the belief seems to have a popular currency among many …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Superstitions (6) Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Superstitions (5)

Today: “Never Write a One-Sentence Paragraph.” o “A paragraph may contain but one sentence . . . [or] two sentences; but usually it contains more than two.” Adams S. Hill, The Foundations of Rhetoric 23-24 (1896). o “To interpose a one-sentence paragraph at intervals — at longish intervals — is prudent. Such a device helps …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Superstitions (5) Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries

suppressible. So spelled — not *"suppressable." Surinamese; *Surinamer. For a citizen of Suriname, the first is standard; the second is a needless variant. surprise, n. & vb., is surprisingly often misspelled *"surprize" — e.g.: “There are other benefits that come from engaging an investment counselor who is paid for service: . . . fewer surprizes …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Superstitions (4)

 Today: “Never Begin a Sentence with ‘And’ or ‘But.’” o “Next to the groundless notion that it is incorrect to end an English sentence with a preposition, perhaps the most wide-spread of many false beliefs about the use of our language is the equally groundless notion that it is incorrect to begin one with ‘but’ …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Superstitions (4) Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Superstitions(3)

Today: “Never Split a Verb Phrase.” o “In a compound verb (‘have seen’) with an adverb, that adverb comes between the auxiliary and the participle (‘I have never seen her’); or, if there are two or more auxiliaries, immediately after the first auxiliary (‘I have always been intending to go to Paris’); that order is …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Superstitions(3) Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Superstitions (2)

 Today: “Never Split an Infinitive.” o “Anybody who doesn’t wish to see too wide a division between the spoken and the written speech will not be too severe against the split infinitive. A man may write ‘to tell really’ or ‘really to tell,’ but he will probably say ‘to really tell.’ It seems to us …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Superstitions (2) Read More »

Scroll to Top