LawProse Lesson #264: The chronology of relevant events.

LawProse Lesson #264: The chronology of relevant events.

What’s the most important step in writing a statement of facts? It’s the creation of a chronology of relevant events—a document that lists, day by day and time by time, every important occurrence bearing on the interactions between parties. Lawyers often ask clients to prepare such a chronology as a starting point. Although the quality varies according to the client’s skill and knowledge, this timeline can be an excellent exercise for the client to understand precisely what has happened. It helps you, too. As your client’s counselor, you need to understand the circumstances that have led to a dispute. Not until you prepare a chronology are you likely to understand the diverse elements involved: e-mails, phone calls, meetings, and other conversations. The chronology helps you fit events together as if they were pieces of a puzzle. It’s a crucial step in case preparation. Once you have the detailed timeline, you can begin drafting a narrative for a motion or brief. The important point here is to avoid a series of sentences that say, “On September 16, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., . . . . On September 17, 2016, at 11:38 a.m., . . . .” That’s fine in your chronology of relevant events—you want all those dates and times at hand—but as a matter of prose style, it’s unremittingly tedious. The pinpoint dates and times are often unnecessary in narrative. Instead, relate the events as a good storyteller would. Identify the characters and place them in time and locale (who, what, when, where). Give mostly relative times: “An hour later,” “The following morning,” “For two months,” etc. When the story calls for specific references, be only as precise as necessary: “The following Monday,” “On the morning of March 12,” “In May 2015,” and so on. Meanwhile, amplify your chronology as new facts come to light. Keep it factual and concrete, shorn of conclusory characterizations. The statement of facts is never the place for arguments. From time to time, you’ll be tempted to skip creating a chronology of relevant events. Never do that. Force yourself. You’ll benefit tremendously from making this a mandatory step in your preparation. Further reading: Garner, The Winning Brief 524–46 (3d ed. 2014). Scalia & Garner, Making Your Case 95–96 (2008).

Live seminars this year with Professor Bryan A. Garner: Advanced Legal Writing & Editing

Attend the most popular CLE seminar of all time. More than 215,000 people—including lawyers, judges, law clerks, and paralegals—have benefited since the early 1990s. You'll learn the keys to professional writing and acquire no-nonsense techniques to make your letters, memos, and briefs more powerful.

You'll also learn what doesn't work and why—know-how gathered through Professor Garner's unique experience in training lawyers at the country's top law firms, state and federal courts, government agencies, and Fortune 500 companies.

Professor Garner gives you the keys to make the most of your writing aptitude—in letters, memos, briefs, and more. The seminar covers five essential skills for persuasive writing:

  • framing issues that arrest the readers' attention;
  • cutting wordiness that wastes readers' time;
  • using transitions deftly to make your argument flow;
  • quoting authority more effectively; and
  • tackling your writing projects more efficiently.

He teaches dozens of techniques that make a big difference. Most important, he shows you what doesn't work—and why—and how to cultivate skillfulness.

Register to reserve your spot today.

Have you wanted to bring Professor Garner to teach your group? Contact us at for more information about in-house seminars.

Scroll to Top