LawProse Lesson #132: Using articles before abbreviations

LawProse Lesson #132: Using articles before abbreviations

What is the right way to use articles before abbreviations? EPA or the EPA? An HMO or a HMO? There is no single “right” answer to this question. Conventional usage prevails. EPA is more common than the EPA when it’s standing alone (more on this below). But HMO is very uncommon — as rare as the HBO.      There are two types of abbreviations: acronyms and initialisms. An acronym is made from the first letters or parts of a compound term. It’s read or spoken as a single word (e.g., awol, radar, NASA). An initialism is also made from the first letters or parts of a compound term, but it’s sounded letter by letter (e.g., ATM, SUV, NBA). Acronyms generally are not preceded by an article {history of NASA}, unless they are being used as an adjective {the NASA employees}. With initialisms, it’s common — but not required — to use an article {EPA or the EPA}. When an indefinite article is needed before the abbreviation, the choice between a and an depends simply on how the first syllable is sounded: the sound rather than the letter controls. Use a before abbreviations beginning with a consonant sound {a UFO} {a PIN} {a CLE program}. Use an before abbreviations that begin with a vowel sound {an FBI agent} {an NRA member} {an SEC report}. Note that an initialism may be paired with a different article from the one used with an acronym that starts with the same letter {an HTML website for a HUD program}. Sources: The Chicago Manual of Style § 7.44, at 362, § 10.9, at 491 (16th ed. 2010). The Redbook § 12.3, at 246 (3d ed. 2013). Garner’s Modern American Usage 1, 2 (3d ed. 2009). Thanks to William L. Berg and John A. Strylowski for suggesting this topic.

1 thought on “LawProse Lesson #132: Using articles before abbreviations”

  1. What’s the difference between a right answer and a “right” answer? A nod to the debate between descriptivists and prescriptivists?

Comments are closed.

Live seminars this year with Professor Bryan A. Garner: Advanced Legal Writing & Editing

Attend the most popular CLE seminar of all time. More than 215,000 people—including lawyers, judges, law clerks, and paralegals—have benefited since the early 1990s. You'll learn the keys to professional writing and acquire no-nonsense techniques to make your letters, memos, and briefs more powerful.

You'll also learn what doesn't work and why—know-how gathered through Professor Garner's unique experience in training lawyers at the country's top law firms, state and federal courts, government agencies, and Fortune 500 companies.

Professor Garner gives you the keys to make the most of your writing aptitude—in letters, memos, briefs, and more. The seminar covers five essential skills for persuasive writing:

  • framing issues that arrest the readers' attention;
  • cutting wordiness that wastes readers' time;
  • using transitions deftly to make your argument flow;
  • quoting authority more effectively; and
  • tackling your writing projects more efficiently.

He teaches dozens of techniques that make a big difference. Most important, he shows you what doesn't work—and why—and how to cultivate skillfulness.

Register to reserve your spot today.

Have you wanted to bring Professor Garner to teach your group? Contact us at info@lawprose.org for more information about in-house seminars.

Scroll to Top