Bryan A. Garner

LawProse Lesson #110

What are the most common misuses of apostrophes? The apostrophe does three things. Its first two uses are straightforward: To indicate a possessive <the plaintiff’s brief>. To mark the omission of one or more characters, especially in a contraction, as with can’t for cannot, or ’99 for 1999. The third use is a little tricky …

LawProse Lesson #110 Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Subject-Verb Agreement (6).

Part A: Plural Units Denoting Amounts. In American English, a plural noun denoting a small unit by which a larger amount is measured generally takes a singular verb — e.g.: o “Five hours are [read ‘is’] enough time.” o “Fifteen minutes pass [read ‘passes’] more quickly than you might think.” Part B: “one and one …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Subject-Verb Agreement (6). Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Subject-Verb Agreement (5).

Today: Misleading Connectives. The phrases “accompanied by,” “added to,” “along with,” “as well as,” “coupled with,” and “together with” do not affect the grammatical number of the nouns preceding or following them. When such a phrase joins two singular nouns, the singular verb is called for — e.g.: o “For example, he says, America’s declining …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Subject-Verb Agreement (5). Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Subject-Verb Agreement (4).

Today: Compound Subjects Joined Conjunctively. If two or more subjects joined by “and” are different and separable, they take a plural verb — e.g.: o “At the same time, the democratic process and the personal participation of the citizen in his government is [read are] not all we want.” Charles P. Curtis Jr., Lions Under …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Subject-Verb Agreement (4). Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Subject-Verb Agreement (3).

Today: False Attraction to Predicate Noun. Occasionally a writer incorrectly looks to the predicate rather than to the subject for the noun that will govern the verb. The “correct” way of phrasing the sentence is often awkward, so the writer is well advised to find another way of stating the idea — e.g.: o “You …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Subject-Verb Agreement (3). Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Subject-Verb Agreement (2).

Today: False Attraction to Noun Intervening Between Subject and Verb. This subheading denotes a mistake in number usually resulting when a plural noun intervenes between a singular subject and the verb. The writer’s eye is thrown off course by the plural noun that appears nearest the verb — e.g.: o “The stalled barges and the …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Subject-Verb Agreement (2). Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Subject-Verb Agreement (1).

Today: The General Rule. The simple rule is to use a plural verb with a plural subject, a singular verb with a singular subject. But there are complications. If a sentence has two or more singular subjects connected by “and,” use a plural verb. Yet if the subjects really amount to a single person or …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Subject-Verb Agreement (1). Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries.

Miscellaneous Entries. sty (= an inflammation on the eyelid) is the standard spelling. (*"Stye" is a variant form.) The plural is “sties.” Another word spelled “sty” (= a pen for pigs) also has the plural “sties.” stylish; stylistic. “Stylish” = in style, in vogue {a stylish hat}. “Stylistic” = (1) having to do with style …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: stymie; *stymy.

This term, originally from golf, is best spelled “stymie.” It can function as a noun {a serious stymie}, but more commonly it’s a verb — e.g.: o “Danielle Odom brings quiet pathos to the damaged little girl — though the tongue-twisting lines she’s handed once she arrives in heaven would stymie virtually any child actor.” …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: stymie; *stymy. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: stupefy.

So spelled. *"Stupify" is a fairly common misspelling — e.g.: o “Insurance agents will stupify [read ‘stupefy’] their clients with [obscure] notations.” James W. Johnson, Logic and Rhetoric 197 (1962). o “Drugs like heroin and cocaine typically stupify [read ‘stupefy’] and immobilize the user.” Richard Morin, “New Facts and Hot Stats from the Social Sciences,” …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: stupefy. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: stultify.

“Stultify” formerly meant “to attempt to prove mental incapacity.” By modest extension, it came to mean either “to make or cause to appear foolish” or “to put in a stupor.” E.g.: “Rote liturgy can stultify as well as edify.” Daniel B. Clendenin, “Why I’m Not Orthodox,” Christianity Today, 6 Jan. 1997, at 32. Then, by …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: stultify. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: strike / struck / struck.

So inflected. The form *"striked" is erroneous — e.g.: o “The No. 8 Hillbillies striked [read ‘struck’] next when Jack McDaniels returned an interception 97 yards to knot the score at 7.” “N. Marion Breezes over Huntington,” Charleston Gaz., 22 Nov. 1997, at B4. o “As recently as the late Sixties, British post-war race relations …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: strike / struck / struck. Read More »

LawProse Lesson #108

Should you avoid using sanction for fear of being misunderstood? Is its use sanctionable?       ANSWER: No, as long as your prose makes the contextual meaning clear. Sanction is a contronym: a word that bears contradictory senses. Think of oversight, which can mean either “responsible supervision” <the CFO has oversight of all budget matters> or “careless …

LawProse Lesson #108 Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: stride / strode / stridden.

So inflected. The past participle “stridden” (attested in the Oxford English Dictionary from 1576 to 1970), as well as its variant form “strode” (attested from 1817 to 1963), rarely appears today. Another past-participial form, *”strid,” was current before 1800, but it is now obsolete. The form “strode” can be either the simple past or the …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: stride / strode / stridden. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: stricken.

Though *”stricken” often appears as a past participle, grammatical authorities have long considered it inferior to “struck.” It’s archaic except when used as an adjective {a stricken community}. The past-participial use is ill-advised — e.g.: “A noncompete agreement that bans a person from ever setting up a competing company in the same geographical location will …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: stricken. Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Language-Change Index

Language-Change Index. The third edition of Garner’s Modern American Usage reflects several new practices. Invariably inferior forms, for example, are now marked with asterisks preceding the term or phrase, a marking common in linguistics. The most interesting new feature is the Language-Change Index. Its purpose is to measure how widely accepted various linguistic innovations have …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Language-Change Index Read More »

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries.

stratum. The plural is “strata” — which should not be used as a singular but sometimes is. E.g.: “By contrast with the atmosphere of, say, Sinclair Lewis’s ‘Main Street,’ in which an afternoon call or the purchase of a shirtwaist might occasion endless talk among every strata [read ‘stratum’] of a community, minding our own …

Garner’s Usage Tip of the Day: Miscellaneous Entries. Read More »

Scroll to Top