LawProse Lesson #299: Still more anomalies of spelling.

LawProse Lesson #299: Still more anomalies of spelling.

As we’ve seen over the last two LawProse lessons, English orthography is riddled with anomalous exceptions to what seem, by analogy, to be norms. A great example is idiosyncrasy, the only English word ending –crasy (as befits the sense of the term). All the words having to do with governmental forms (aristocracy, democracy, ochlocracy, plutocracy, etc.) have a different word root at the end. So remembering quirky things like how to spell idiosyncrasy—there are hundreds of similar examples—takes up cognitive energy. It takes conscious effort. Here’s our third installment in this series of four. Thank you to all the readers who continue submitting examples. Remember: this isn’t always about etymology, but about seeming correspondences that might cause a casual observer to expect a linguistic analogy to work when it doesn’t. armadillos but peccadilloes bingeing but tinging cagey but caginess caliber but calibrate encrust but incrustation excludable but includible fence but defense (in American English) glamour but glamorous grain but granary hammer but grammar Herbert but sherbet juror but perjurer lunging but whingeing maintain but maintenance millionaire but questionnaire muffle but duffel patriot but expatriate publicly but plastically ratable but hateable religious but religiosity similar but simulate storm but maelstrom syrah but petite sirah vinegar but vinaigrette weaselly but weevily wondrous but splendorous A little kooky, isn’t it—these matters of English spelling? Spell-checkers can help (or sometimes hurt), of course, but professional copyeditors typically just memorize the hard ones and call them to mind as needed. If they’ve forgotten the precise spelling, they know enough about anomalies to check a good dictionary or usage dictionary. Keep the examples coming to (copy to Many thanks to all who wrote with suggestions over the past week: Jean Ashby, Charles E. Damon, Evan Haglund, Alan D. Hegi, James E. Holland Jr., Bernard Kabak, Mary B. Marcin, Tim Morgan, Jonathan Shev, Christopher A. Troutt, Ann Ward, and Joan Westmeyer. SOURCE: Garner’s Modern English Usage 849–51 (4th ed. 2016) (s.v. “Spelling”); see also id. at 702–05 (s.v. “Plurals”); id. at 5–6 (s.v. “-able”).

Live seminars this year with Professor Bryan A. Garner: Advanced Legal Writing & Editing

Attend the most popular CLE seminar of all time. More than 215,000 people—including lawyers, judges, law clerks, and paralegals—have benefited since the early 1990s. You'll learn the keys to professional writing and acquire no-nonsense techniques to make your letters, memos, and briefs more powerful.

You'll also learn what doesn't work and why—know-how gathered through Professor Garner's unique experience in training lawyers at the country's top law firms, state and federal courts, government agencies, and Fortune 500 companies.

Professor Garner gives you the keys to make the most of your writing aptitude—in letters, memos, briefs, and more. The seminar covers five essential skills for persuasive writing:

  • framing issues that arrest the readers' attention;
  • cutting wordiness that wastes readers' time;
  • using transitions deftly to make your argument flow;
  • quoting authority more effectively; and
  • tackling your writing projects more efficiently.

He teaches dozens of techniques that make a big difference. Most important, he shows you what doesn't work—and why—and how to cultivate skillfulness.

Register to reserve your spot today.

Have you wanted to bring Professor Garner to teach your group? Contact us at for more information about in-house seminars.

Scroll to Top