LawProse Lesson #141: Should it be “e-mail” or “email”?

LawProse Lesson #141: Should it be “e-mail” or “email”?

Should it be e-mail or email? Two weeks ago, the New York Times officially dropped the hyphen in e-mail because of “popular demand,” according to its editor for news presentation, Patrick LaForge. The Associated Press Stylebook changed its style to the unhyphenated email in 2011, but it retained the hyphen in sister terms such as e-book, e-commerce, and e-business. On the other side of the fence, The Chicago Manual of Style (16th ed. 2010) and Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (11th ed. 2011) continue to retain the hyphen. Because the e– is not a prefix but a stand-in for electronic, some editors still prefer the hyphenated form e-mail. In the third edition of Garner’s Modern American Usage (2009), I rated the use of email for e-mail at Stage 4 in my 5-stage Language-Change Index. That is to say, by 2009 the solid form had become virtually universal but was opposed on cogent grounds by a few linguistic stalwarts (die-hard snoots). But has the use of email now moved to Stage 5, where the form is universally accepted (not counting pseudo-snoot eccentrics)? Certainly the flip-flop by the New York Times — the Gray Lady herself — is a big blow to the stalwart defenders of e-mail. In Lapsing into a Comma, Bill Walsh, the Washington Post copyeditor, called the unhyphenated email “an abomination.” That was in 2000 — when e-mail was still dominant. He observed: “No initial-based term in the history of the English language has ever evolved to form a solid word — a few are split, and the rest are hyphenated.” He gave these examples: A-frame, B-movie, D-day, T-shirt, and X-ray. Walsh’s further argument for keeping the hyphen stems from pronunciation: “at first glance, the e in email begs to be pronounced unaccented, as a schwa (‘uh-MAIL’). Setting the letter apart makes it clear that the letter is a letter and that the one-letter syllable is accented. E! E! Eeeeeee!” Walsh and other stalwarts have cogent grounds. But the tide of history will be against the form, and email will doubtless be the only form most people will have ever seen a few years from now. But I still call it Stage 4, not 5. Maybe with the switch by the New York Times, the solid form is about Stage 4.7. Sources: Garner’s Modern American Usage xxxv, 300 (3d ed. 2009). Garner’s Dictionary of Legal Usage 311 (3d ed. 2011). The Chicago Manual of Style (16th ed. 2010) (using e-mail throughout). Bill Walsh, Lapsing into a Comma 16 (2000). The Associated Press Stylebook and Briefing on Media Law 94 (2013). Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary 405 (11th ed. 2011). Thanks to Thomas G. Stack for suggesting this topic.

2 thoughts on “LawProse Lesson #141: Should it be “e-mail” or “email”?”

  1. Cathy J. Rotunda

    Bill Walsh’s argument that “… the e in email begs to be pronounced unaccented, as a schwa (‘uh-MAIL’)” makes me suspect that he has never taught a child or a nonnative English speaker to read. First we teach the sounds of the individual letters. Ca for C. Ah for A. Ta for T. But then we move quickly into sight words. Ca-Ah-Ta becomes CAT. We train the brain to see the whole word and not the individual parts. The same is true with new words introduced into the written language. We may trip over “email” once or twice, but after that our brains naturally pick it up as a sight word.

  2. Website has also become one word in most commercial publications and style guides. Has email reached Stage 5 yet?

Comments are closed.

Live seminars this year with Professor Bryan A. Garner: Advanced Legal Writing & Editing

Attend the most popular CLE seminar of all time. More than 215,000 people—including lawyers, judges, law clerks, and paralegals—have benefited since the early 1990s. You'll learn the keys to professional writing and acquire no-nonsense techniques to make your letters, memos, and briefs more powerful.

You'll also learn what doesn't work and why—know-how gathered through Professor Garner's unique experience in training lawyers at the country's top law firms, state and federal courts, government agencies, and Fortune 500 companies.

Professor Garner gives you the keys to make the most of your writing aptitude—in letters, memos, briefs, and more. The seminar covers five essential skills for persuasive writing:

  • framing issues that arrest the readers' attention;
  • cutting wordiness that wastes readers' time;
  • using transitions deftly to make your argument flow;
  • quoting authority more effectively; and
  • tackling your writing projects more efficiently.

He teaches dozens of techniques that make a big difference. Most important, he shows you what doesn't work—and why—and how to cultivate skillfulness.

Register to reserve your spot today.

Have you wanted to bring Professor Garner to teach your group? Contact us at for more information about in-house seminars.

Scroll to Top