LawProse Lesson #106

LawProse Lesson #106

How did the jargonistic same — used as a pronoun — cause a crisis of presidential succession? Using same as a pronoun — as in acknowledging same or making note of same — is a primary symptom of legalese. And it’s imprecise legalese — the worst kind. When used as a pronoun, same can mean either the singular it or the plural they, and that can lead to ambiguity in interpretation. An ambiguous same in Article II of the U.S. Constitution once gave rise to a major legal question: Was John Tyler really the tenth president of the United States? In 1841, after speaking for two hours in the rain at his inauguration and contracting pneumonia, President William Henry Harrison died in office — barely a month into the ninth presidency of the United States. His vice president, John Tyler, became the new president. Or did he? The answer turned on the wording of Article II of the Constitution: “In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President.” But what, precisely, devolved: the office or the powers and duties of said office? Did John Tyler become the tenth president, or did he remain the vice president while having the powers and duties of the presidency? Using it or they or, better yet, office would have prevented the ambiguity. Senators debated the point for some time before Congress passed a resolution referring to Tyler as “the President of the United States.” But historians still debate the legal question. The same same caused a different problem in 1919 when President Woodrow Wilson suffered a stroke. The question was whether Wilson’s vice president should assume the office of president (effectively deposing the ailing Wilson) or only the duties and powers of the presidency (in case the elected president recovered before the end of his term). Ultimately, neither was done: the president’s wife, Edith, unofficially assumed her husband’s duties and powers until March 1921. In the field of textual interpretation, the so-called last-antecedent canon would resolve the issue favorably to Tyler and to all the other vice presidents who succeeded to the presidency. The last-antecedent canon states that a pronoun, relative pronoun, or demonstrative adjective generally refers to the nearest reasonable antecedent. In Article II, office is the nearest reasonable antecedent of same; the phrase powers and duties, though reasonable, is more remote. The ambiguity was finally eliminated in 1967. The 25th Amendment remedied it by providing that if the president dies, resigns, or is removed, “the Vice President shall become President.” If the president is disabled, the vice president assumes the office’s powers and duties as “acting president” for as long as the disability continues. The simplest way to prevent any ambiguity with same is to avoid using it as a pronoun altogether. Sources: Garner’s Modern American Usage 726 (3d ed. 2009). Garner’s Dictionary of Legal Usage 796 (3d ed. 2011). Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 144 (2012). David P. Currie, “His Accidency,” 5 Green Bag (2d series) 151, 154 (2002).

1 thought on “LawProse Lesson #106”

  1. “Same” as a pronoun has some pedigree, as in the Book of Common Prayer:

    WHEREFORE O Lord and heavenly Father, according to the institution of thy dearly beloved Son our Saviour Jesus Christ, we, thy humble servants, do celebrate and make here before thy Divine Majesty, with these thy holy gifts, which we now offer unto thee, the memorial thy Son hath commanded us to make; having in remembrance his blessed passion and precious death, his mighty resurrection and glorious ascension; rendering unto thee most hearty thanks for the innumerable benefits procured unto us by the same.

Comments are closed.

Live seminars this year with Professor Bryan A. Garner: Advanced Legal Writing & Editing

Attend the most popular CLE seminar of all time. More than 215,000 people—including lawyers, judges, law clerks, and paralegals—have benefited since the early 1990s. You'll learn the keys to professional writing and acquire no-nonsense techniques to make your letters, memos, and briefs more powerful.

You'll also learn what doesn't work and why—know-how gathered through Professor Garner's unique experience in training lawyers at the country's top law firms, state and federal courts, government agencies, and Fortune 500 companies.

Professor Garner gives you the keys to make the most of your writing aptitude—in letters, memos, briefs, and more. The seminar covers five essential skills for persuasive writing:

  • framing issues that arrest the readers' attention;
  • cutting wordiness that wastes readers' time;
  • using transitions deftly to make your argument flow;
  • quoting authority more effectively; and
  • tackling your writing projects more efficiently.

He teaches dozens of techniques that make a big difference. Most important, he shows you what doesn't work—and why—and how to cultivate skillfulness.

Register to reserve your spot today.

Have you wanted to bring Professor Garner to teach your group? Contact us at for more information about in-house seminars.

Scroll to Top