*sooner rather than later. Not only is this idiom redundant; it isn't entirely logical because the comparison is never completed. Sooner and not later than what? "Soon" is usually an improvement — e.g.: o "If so, that could dampen fears that the Federal Reserve will act sooner, rather than later, [read 'soon'] to boost interest rates again." William Goodwin, "Jobs Report Fails to Shake Up Markets," Am. Banker, 10 Oct. 1994, at 48. o "They argue that subjects such as Jerusalem are so central to the debate that they should be dealt with sooner rather than later [read 'soon']." Rebecca Trounson, "Ready to Tackle the Tough Issues, Netanyahu Says," L.A. Times, 8 Oct. 1996, at A1. Language-Change Index — *"sooner rather than later": Stage 4. *Invariably inferior forms. ——————– Quotation of the Day: "If you begin a sentence with 'and' or 'but' (and you should occasionally), don't put a comma after it. You want to speed up your prose with those words, and the comma would simply cancel out any gain." John R. Trimble, Writing with Style 81 (1975)
Scroll to Top