LawProse Lesson #315: Judging Motions: Part 3.

LawProse Lesson #315: Judging Motions: Part 3.

Over the past two weeks, we’ve seen that the first two criteria in assessing the quality of motions and responses are to examine page 1 and the point headings. Now for the third. Step 3 is the fresh conclusion. It should be a short, punchy summary that doesn’t merely repeat what’s been said before. It should be a freshly written closer that keeps the reader’s interest. It should be fully comprehensible on its own. That’s the way it should be. But it hardly ever is. Most conclusions are rote sentences that simply send the reader back to the middle part of the motion (“For all the foregoing reasons,” or “Wherefore, premises considered”). Those are the closing words beloved of so-called “generic lawyers.” What percentage of motions and responses do well when judged by this standard for gauging conclusions? Less than 3%. What?! You’re offended? Please don’t be. I didn’t call you a generic lawyer. Perhaps I just suggested that you might have a bad habit you should think about breaking. Further reading: Legal Writing in Plain English 71 (2d ed. 2013). Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges 37–38, 100–01 (2008). The Winning Brief 143–47 (3d ed. 2014).

Live seminars this year with Professor Bryan A. Garner: Advanced Legal Writing & Editing

Attend the most popular CLE seminar of all time. More than 215,000 people—including lawyers, judges, law clerks, and paralegals—have benefited since the early 1990s. You'll learn the keys to professional writing and acquire no-nonsense techniques to make your letters, memos, and briefs more powerful.

You'll also learn what doesn't work and why—know-how gathered through Professor Garner's unique experience in training lawyers at the country's top law firms, state and federal courts, government agencies, and Fortune 500 companies.

Professor Garner gives you the keys to make the most of your writing aptitude—in letters, memos, briefs, and more. The seminar covers five essential skills for persuasive writing:

  • framing issues that arrest the readers' attention;
  • cutting wordiness that wastes readers' time;
  • using transitions deftly to make your argument flow;
  • quoting authority more effectively; and
  • tackling your writing projects more efficiently.

He teaches dozens of techniques that make a big difference. Most important, he shows you what doesn't work—and why—and how to cultivate skillfulness.

Register to reserve your spot today.

Have you wanted to bring Professor Garner to teach your group? Contact us at info@lawprose.org for more information about in-house seminars.

Scroll to Top