LawProse Lesson #308: Acknowledging dictum.

LawProse Lesson #308: Acknowledging dictum.

Don’t quote dictum without noting that it’s dictum.

Of all the problems in jurisprudence, one of the trickiest can be distinguishing between a court’s holding and its dictum. It often takes a close inspection of the court’s writing to make that distinction. Essentially, a holding is an appellate court’s determination of a matter of law pivotal to its decision. Anything else said in an opinion is dictum—or, if you’re enumerating instances, dicta (the plural noun). Although dictum is often dismissed as if it had no value at all, it can be highly persuasive. It may be the best indicator of how the court would decide a case like yours. The higher the court, the more sway its dictum has. So invoking “mere dictum”—as it’s often disparagingly called—from the highest court in your jurisdiction can indeed be persuasive. But merely noting that a judicial statement you’re quoting is dictum can also give you credibility: you’re not only acknowledging that the statement isn’t binding, you’re also signaling that you’re a meticulous writer. And if you tell your readers in advance what assumptions or different circumstances were at play in the court’s statement, you’re likely to enhance that credibility. Further reading: For a thorough discussion of the distinction between holdings and dicta, see Bryan A. Garner et al., The Law of Judicial Precedent § 4, at 44–75 (2016).

Live seminars this year with Professor Bryan A. Garner: Advanced Legal Writing & Editing

Attend the most popular CLE seminar of all time. More than 215,000 people—including lawyers, judges, law clerks, and paralegals—have benefited since the early 1990s. You'll learn the keys to professional writing and acquire no-nonsense techniques to make your letters, memos, and briefs more powerful.

You'll also learn what doesn't work and why—know-how gathered through Professor Garner's unique experience in training lawyers at the country's top law firms, state and federal courts, government agencies, and Fortune 500 companies.

Professor Garner gives you the keys to make the most of your writing aptitude—in letters, memos, briefs, and more. The seminar covers five essential skills for persuasive writing:

  • framing issues that arrest the readers' attention;
  • cutting wordiness that wastes readers' time;
  • using transitions deftly to make your argument flow;
  • quoting authority more effectively; and
  • tackling your writing projects more efficiently.

He teaches dozens of techniques that make a big difference. Most important, he shows you what doesn't work—and why—and how to cultivate skillfulness.

Register to reserve your spot today.

Have you wanted to bring Professor Garner to teach your group? Contact us at info@lawprose.org for more information about in-house seminars.

Scroll to Top