LawProse Lesson #161: Multiple punctuation marks.

LawProse Lesson #161: Multiple punctuation marks.

Multiple punctuation marks. After last week’s lesson on punctuation with quotation marks, a few people asked how to punctuate a midsentence quotation that ends in a question mark. For example: By first deliberately stating an incorrect version of the events and then asking, “That’s the way it happened, isn’t it?” the detective lured the suspect into contradicting his earlier story. Do you put a comma after the quotation? If so, where does it go? Both The Chicago Manual of Style and The Gregg Reference Manual state that you omit the comma in this situation. “When a question mark or exclamation point appears at the end of a quotation where a comma would normally appear, the comma is omitted.” The Chicago Manual of Style § 6.119, at 343 (16th ed. 2010). But the two sources differ when it comes to titles of a work. Chicago does add the comma: “Are You a Doctor?,” the fifth story in Will You Please Be Quiet, Please?, treats modern love. Gregg does not: Although we were all asked last week to read an article entitled “Can U.S. Manufacturers Prosper in Today’s World Markets?” the topic was totally ignored in this week’s seminar. Rather than: Although we were all asked last week to read an article entitled “Can U.S. Manufacturers Prosper in Today’s World Markets?,” the topic was totally ignored in this week’s seminar. Another common question is what to do when an abbreviation ends a sentence. Do you add an additional period? The answer is no. When an abbreviation (or other expression that takes a period) ends a sentence, do not add an additional period {The report was published by Smithstone, Inc.}. But when any other punctuation mark is needed immediately after the period, use both marks {Did she tell you that she is an M.D.?}. As always, if the phrasing or punctuation is awkward (as it usually is in midsentence) or could lead to confusion, it would be better to rewrite the sentence to avoid the problem. For example, the first example in this lesson could’ve been recast: “The detective lured the suspect into contradicting his earlier story by first deliberately stating an incorrect version of the events and then asking, “That’s the way it happened, isn’t it?” Further reading: The Chicago Manual of Style §§ 6.116-6.120, at 343-44 (16th ed. 2010). William A. Sabin, The Gregg Reference Manual §§ 259-61, at 75-76 (10th ed. 2005). Thanks to Daniel K. Crane-Hirsch, Geoff Iida, and Richard Wills for suggesting this topic.

Live seminars this year with Professor Bryan A. Garner: Advanced Legal Writing & Editing

Attend the most popular CLE seminar of all time. More than 215,000 people—including lawyers, judges, law clerks, and paralegals—have benefited since the early 1990s. You'll learn the keys to professional writing and acquire no-nonsense techniques to make your letters, memos, and briefs more powerful.

You'll also learn what doesn't work and why—know-how gathered through Professor Garner's unique experience in training lawyers at the country's top law firms, state and federal courts, government agencies, and Fortune 500 companies.

Professor Garner gives you the keys to make the most of your writing aptitude—in letters, memos, briefs, and more. The seminar covers five essential skills for persuasive writing:

  • framing issues that arrest the readers' attention;
  • cutting wordiness that wastes readers' time;
  • using transitions deftly to make your argument flow;
  • quoting authority more effectively; and
  • tackling your writing projects more efficiently.

He teaches dozens of techniques that make a big difference. Most important, he shows you what doesn't work—and why—and how to cultivate skillfulness.

Register to reserve your spot today.

Have you wanted to bring Professor Garner to teach your group? Contact us at info@lawprose.org for more information about in-house seminars.

Scroll to Top