LawProse Lesson #145: *Is comprised of

LawProse Lesson #145: *Is comprised of

*Is comprised of Fastidious use of comprise has become increasingly rare. Garner’s Modern American Usage labels the form *is comprised of as “invariably inferior” (that’s what the asterisk signifies), yet gauges its acceptance in actual use as Stage 4 on the 5-stage “language-change index.” To you as a legal writer, that means using the phrase still causes some danger that your judicial reader might well cringe at your sloppy usage. To get comprise and its partners — such as compose and make up — straight, let’s boil down the distinctions and make it simpler to use these words correctly. The parts of something make up the whole {thirty lawyers make up the firm}. The whole is composed of the parts {the firm is composed of thirty lawyers}. The whole comprises its parts {the firm comprises thirty lawyers}. The parts are comprised in the whole {thirty lawyers are comprised in the firm}. Many mistakes occur with comprise, which means “to contain, to include, to consist of.” Comprise takes the preposition in, never of. So the phrase *is comprised of should be replaced by either is composed of or comprises {the committee *is comprised of [read is composed of or comprises] three practicing lawyers, two judges, and five law professors}. Another common error is using comprise for constitute {the 12-acre ranch, stocks and bonds, and jewelry comprise [read constitute or make up] the grandfather’s estate}. If you find yourself hesitating when choosing between compose and comprise, test the relationship between the subject and the object by using make up. If the sentence makes sense, then compose is the right word {the lawyers make up the committee} {the committee is made up of lawyers}. Otherwise, comprise is correct. Next week: The IP bar’s special—and idiosyncratic—use of comprise. Sources: Garner’s Modern American Usage 175 (3d ed. 2009). Garner’s Dictionary of Legal Usage 188-89 (3d ed. 2011). The Redbook: A Manual on Legal Style § 12.3, at 262 (3d ed. 2013). Wilson Follett, Modern American Usage: A Guide 102 (Barzun ed. 1966). R.W. Burchfield, The New Fowler’s Modern English Usage 167-68 (3d ed. 1996). Thanks to Dale Conder Jr., Patricia Leigh Disert, David Rosenbloom, and Rick Schnake for suggesting this topic.

Live seminars this year with Professor Bryan A. Garner: Advanced Legal Writing & Editing

Attend the most popular CLE seminar of all time. More than 215,000 people—including lawyers, judges, law clerks, and paralegals—have benefited since the early 1990s. You'll learn the keys to professional writing and acquire no-nonsense techniques to make your letters, memos, and briefs more powerful.

You'll also learn what doesn't work and why—know-how gathered through Professor Garner's unique experience in training lawyers at the country's top law firms, state and federal courts, government agencies, and Fortune 500 companies.

Professor Garner gives you the keys to make the most of your writing aptitude—in letters, memos, briefs, and more. The seminar covers five essential skills for persuasive writing:

  • framing issues that arrest the readers' attention;
  • cutting wordiness that wastes readers' time;
  • using transitions deftly to make your argument flow;
  • quoting authority more effectively; and
  • tackling your writing projects more efficiently.

He teaches dozens of techniques that make a big difference. Most important, he shows you what doesn't work—and why—and how to cultivate skillfulness.

Register to reserve your spot today.

Have you wanted to bring Professor Garner to teach your group? Contact us at for more information about in-house seminars.

Scroll to Top