LawProse Lesson #114: Is it better to say a friend of John’s or a friend of John?

LawProse Lesson #114: Is it better to say a friend of John’s or a friend of John?

The classic example posits the obvious difference between a photograph of Lord Snowdon and a photograph of Lord Snowdon’s. We know who’s in the first picture, but we can’t be sure about the second. In this example, the meaning turns on whether the possessive or nonpossessive form appears. The writer’s choice is straightforward, depending on the intended meaning. But which is correct in this construction: a friend of John or a friend of John’s? Although the practice is sometimes erroneously stigmatized, using a possessive with of has long been considered acceptable. You can say either The car belongs to a friend of Brent or The car belongs to a friend of Brent’s. Of course, it’s also possible to avoid the double possessive by rewording the phrase {the car belongs to Brent’s friend}. Yet the double possessive is impossible to avoid in constructions with personal pronouns. You would never say He’s a friend of me. No — it’s a friend of mine. Likewise, idiom demands an admirer of hers, not an admirer of her. One usage commentator, the late Wilson Follett, insisted that client of Zuber’s is preferable to client of Zuber: “The neglect of this possessive [‘s in Zuber’s] mars the all too common mode of referring to a book of Conrad, a letter of Lincoln, a canvas of Picasso. . . . All these require changing to the possessive ‘s, . . . or else the replacement of the preposition. One can always say a book by Conrad, a letter from Lincoln, [etc.].” The construction comes up most naturally when the relationship between the subject and the object is not an exclusive one {Dan is a friend of Pat’s}. When the relationship is exclusive, the double possessive is inappropriate {Dan is the father of Pat}. The article reveals the nature of the relationship (a friend vs. the father). The double possessive is generally unidiomatic when applied to inanimate things {a friend of the court [not of the court’s]}. And by the way, despite an old superstition, it’s fine to use possessive forms for inanimate things {the hammer’s handle} — just not in conjunction with of {the handle of the hammer [not the handle of the hammer’s]}. Most educated speakers habitually use double possessives:
  • an acquaintance of his;
  • a colleague of hers;
  • some projects of theirs;
  • a cousin of mine;
  • a protégé of Michelangelo’s.
Do readers give you grief about these constructions? That’s just a crotchet of theirs. Sources: Wilson Follett, Modern American Usage: A Guide 255 (1966). Garner’s Modern American Usage 645, 646 (3d ed. 2009). The Chicago Manual of Style 357 (16th ed. 2010). Sheridan Baker, The Complete Stylist 166 (2d ed. 1972). Eric Partridge, Usage and Abusage 132-34 (1982). Thanks to Frank Gatto and Bill Ginsburg for suggesting this topic.

Live seminars this year with Professor Bryan A. Garner: Advanced Legal Writing & Editing

Attend the most popular CLE seminar of all time. More than 215,000 people—including lawyers, judges, law clerks, and paralegals—have benefited since the early 1990s. You'll learn the keys to professional writing and acquire no-nonsense techniques to make your letters, memos, and briefs more powerful.

You'll also learn what doesn't work and why—know-how gathered through Professor Garner's unique experience in training lawyers at the country's top law firms, state and federal courts, government agencies, and Fortune 500 companies.

Professor Garner gives you the keys to make the most of your writing aptitude—in letters, memos, briefs, and more. The seminar covers five essential skills for persuasive writing:

  • framing issues that arrest the readers' attention;
  • cutting wordiness that wastes readers' time;
  • using transitions deftly to make your argument flow;
  • quoting authority more effectively; and
  • tackling your writing projects more efficiently.

He teaches dozens of techniques that make a big difference. Most important, he shows you what doesn't work—and why—and how to cultivate skillfulness.

Register to reserve your spot today.

Have you wanted to bring Professor Garner to teach your group? Contact us at for more information about in-house seminars.

Scroll to Top